Legal Opinion

ter Haar v. Seaboard Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 31, 1940No. 70 CivilPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUMONT, District Judge.

Viewing the complaint as a whole, the court is of the opinion that a cause of action for injunctive relief has been-pleaded. Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corporation, 38 Cal.App.2d 11, 100 P.2d 528; United Railroads v. Superior Court, 172 Cal. 80, 155 P. 463; Kellogg v. King, 114 Cal. 378, 46 P. 166, 55 Am.St.Rep. 74.

The defenses of laches, stale demands and the statute of limitations may not be asserted by motion to dismiss, but should be set forth affirmatively in defendant’s answer (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(c), 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Baker v. SiskDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Bourdieu v. Seaboard Oil Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Sproul v. GamboneDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API