Legal Opinion

Prochnow v. Neitman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

This case was here before, Estate of Neitman, 193 Wis. 305, 214 N. W. 345. All questions there decided are the law of the case. Borosich v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 194 Wis. 289, 215 N. W. 575. On that appea/ it was held that the contract between Charles Neitman and his father was “valid, definite, and capable of enforcement from and by its own terms.” That contract was entered into long before the indebtedness of the father to his daughter, which claim of the daughter wai allowed by the county court and here sought to be made a prior charge to respondent’s claim under such valid contract.

Th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borosich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Estate of Neitman v. NeitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Pierner v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API