Estate of Neitman v. Neitman

The written agreement between the father and son in February, 1900, providing for the. continued possession of the farm then owned by the father and occupied by the son and for its purchase by the son after the death of the survivor of his parents, was valid, definite, *309and capable of enforcement from and by its own terms, and it is unnecessary, therefore, to consider as affecting it the terms of the will of the same date and its revocation by the subsequent will. Doyle v. Fischer, 183 Wis. 599, 606, 198 N. W. 763.

Though the contract declared the value of the farm to be $7,000, yet it also…