Legal Opinion

Borosich v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed October 11, 1927:

Crownhart, J.

This case was here on a former appeal (191 Wis. 239, 210 N. W. 829). All questions there properly before the court for consideration are now res adju-dícala. Foster v. Rowe, 132 Wis. 268, 111 N. W. 688; Lutien v. Kewaunee, 151 Wis. 607, 139 N. W. 312; Zohrlaut v. Mengelberg, 158 Wis. 392, 148 N. W. 314, 149 N. W. 280.

The appellant now claims that the proof of loss establishes the fact that respondent’s claim is not within the policy and hence there is no cause of action. By reference to the records on the former appeal and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burdick v. TyrrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Zohrlaut v. MengelbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Foster v. RoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Lutien v. City of KewauneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Borosich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGovern v. EckhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Pierner v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Prochnow v. NeitmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API