Jason Weiler & Sons v. Haskell Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHickman, C. J.
Appellants are ¿ partnership engaged in the sale of jewelry at wholesale and retail, having their place of business in Boston, Mass. Appellée'is a national banking corporation, having its place of business in Haskell, Tex. Appellants had a rule of business under which, when a customer purchased a diamond from them and desired later to purchase a larger and more expensive one, .they would accept a return of the former as a payment upon the latter at the price at which the former was sold. Some time prior to December, 1923, F. L. Peavy, of Haskell, purchased from appellants a diamond costing…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas Western Railway Co. v. GentryTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Bond v. Terrell Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- San Antonio Hardware Co. v. SangerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- First National Bank v. Greenville Oil & Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1901
- Dexter v. First Guaranty State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3Cited by3 opinions
- Condor Petroleum Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Karr v. CockerhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Karr v. CockerhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937