Legal Opinion

Karr v. Cockerham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1937No. 4756Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

In their motion for rehearing, ap-pellees insist that we erred in several particulars in our original opinion in this case, among which was our holding to the effect that it was the duty of appellees to establish the elements necessary to constitute the Sudan Hotel their homestead. We held that the establishment by jury finding that it was their intention to make the Sudan Hotel their homestead at the' time they removed from the Cordova Hotel to the Hereford Hotel was not sufficient. It is established law in this state that intention alone is not sufficient to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jason Weiler & Sons v. Haskell Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API