Huff Energy Fund, L.P. v. Longview Energy Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.
In this opinion, we address appellants’ complaints regarding the amount of a court-ordered supersedeas bond and court-ordered discovery.1 We consider first whether the statutory cap on a su-persedeas bond contained in Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 52.006 applies per judgment or per judgment debtor. The trial court in this case determined the cap applied per judgment debtor. Appellants argue the cap applies per judgment. We also consider whether the trial court erred in ordering ongoing discovery “for the duration of the appeal.” Appellants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- TGS-NOPEC GEOPHYSICAL CO. v. CombsTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Texas Lottery Commission v. First State Bank of DeQueenTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- In re Nalle Plastics Family Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- in Re Longview Energy Company and in Re Huff Energy Fund, L.P., and Riley-Huff Energy Group, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Dernick Resources, Inc. v. David Wilstein and Leonard Wilstein, Individually and as Trustee of the Leonard and Joyce Wilstein Revocable Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Greystar Development & Construction, L.P. Gabriella Tower, LLC And Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.—Gabriella Tower Contractor Series v. Michelle Williams, James Kirkwood, and Bigge Crane & Rigging, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2024
- In Re Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.; Gabriella Tower, LLC; And Greystar Development & Construction, L.P.—gabriella Tower Contractor SeriesTexas Supreme Court · 2026
- Port Arthur Steam Energy, L.P. v. Oxbow Calcining LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021