Legal Opinion

Tackett v. Duncan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2014No. DA 13-0818PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 Brian Tackett (Brian) appeals from the order of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, granting summary judgment to Defendants Holly Arm Duncan, Stephen Stanley, Robert Hemann, and Charles Tutwiler and Associates, Inc. We affirm.

¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the District Court correctly determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over Defendants.

BACKGROUND

¶3 The following facts are taken from Brian’s complaint, Defendants’ motions to dismiss, and the documents filed in connection with Defendants’ motions.

¶4 Defendant Holly Ann Duncan is a resident of Florida. In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Milky Whey, Inc. v. Dairy Partners, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Deleon v. BNSF Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Buckles Ex Rel. Buckles v. Continental Resources, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Tyrrell v. BNSF Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API