Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 2019No. OP 19-0099PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*411***482¶1 Ford Motor Company (Ford) petitions this Court for a writ of supervisory control following an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, in Charles Lucero v. Ford Motor Company , ADV-18-247(b), denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We accept supervisory control, conclude Montana has specific personal jurisdiction over Ford in this case, and accordingly affirm the District Court's order. This Opinion and Order addresses the following issue:
Does Montana have specific personal jurisdiction over Ford regarding Lucero's design defect, failure…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Ethridge v. Samsung SDICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
- Gateway v. Philadelphia IndemnityMontana Supreme Court · 2020
- Buckles v. Continental Resources Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2020
- Adams v. Aircraft Spruce & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.