Legal Opinion

Austin v. Illinois Farmers Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 2004No. 5-03-0579PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kuehn

This appeal stems from the trial court’s August 21, 2003, order denying the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the plaintiff’s claims. The arbitration provision at issue provides as follows:

“If an insured person and we do not agree[ ] (1) that the person is entitled to recover for medical services, (2) that the medical services are a result of a covered accident, or (3) as to the nature, frequency, or cost of the medical services, either that person or we may demand that the issue be determined by arbitration.

The arbitrator shall determine (1) if the medical services are as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ragan v. AT & T CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Ragan v. AT&T Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API