Legal Opinion

Bernard v. Village of Spring Valley

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 12, 1994No. 1188, Docket 93-7802PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEORGE C. PRATT, Circuit Judge:

The central issue in this case is whether the defendants’ failure to give plaintiffs *295property a separate tax designation as required by New York state law may form the basis for a damage action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in federal court. The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Gerard L. Goettel, Judge, determined that because the available state-court remedies are procedurally adequate, the Tax Injunction Act and principles of comity barred consideration of plaintiffs claims in federal court.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Tully v. Griffin, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Bernard v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. City of LindenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Bernard v. Village Of Spring ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Pontes v. CunhaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  4. J & M Autobody, Inc. v. GavinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  5. Mom's Inc. v. WeberDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API