Dawkins v. Pacific Motor Trucking

Claimant petitions for review of our decision affirming the Workers’ Compensation Board’s determination that he was not entitled to benefits for temporary total disability because he had withdrawn from the work force. 91 Or App 562, 756 P2d 60 (1988). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 10.10, and allow it for the purpose of addressing claimant’s argument that the decision is inconsistent with Chapel of Memories v. Davis, 91 Or App 232, 754 P2d 913, rev den 306 Or 413 (1988).

The distinction between the two cases is factual. Here, claimant testified that he would like to…