Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Kepford

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 1990No. 87-02846; CA A60272Published

1Opinion of the Court

786 P.2d 745 (1990)

100 Or.App. 410

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPENSATION OF CHARLES M. KEPFORD, Claimant.

WEYERHAEUSER Company, Petitioner,

v.

Charles M. KEPFORD, Respondent.

87-02846; CA A60272.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc[*].

Argued and Submitted October 20, 1989.

Decided February 14, 1990.

Resubmitted January 10, 1990.

Paul L. Roess, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Acker, Underwood, Norwood & Hiefield, Portland.

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Christopher D. Moore and Malagon, Moore & Johnson, Eugene.

Resubmitted in…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kepford v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. SAIF Corp. v. StephenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Fazzolari v. United Beer DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Dawkins v. Pacific Motor TruckingOregon Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API