Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. Pacific Motor Trucking

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1989No. WCB 85-11265; CA A43907; SC S35407PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the issue is whether claimant is entitled to temporary total disability from the time of his aggravation claim until the determination that he was permanently and totally disabled. Relying in part upon Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 299 Or 290, 702 P2d 403 (1985), the hearings referee concluded that claimant is not entitled to temporary total disability. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed, as did the Court of Appeals. Dawkins v. Pacific Motor Trucking, 91 Or App 562, 756 P2d 60, reconsideration granted and former opinion adhered to, 93 Or App 349, 762…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. SAIF Corp. v. StephenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dawkins v. Pacific Motor TruckingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  5. Dawkins v. Pacific Motor TruckingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. OverdorffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  2. International Paper Co. v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Forshee & Langley Logging v. PeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Roseburg Forest Products v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API