Legal Opinion

Salzstein v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 13, 1990No. 90 C 5263PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Richard and Candice Salzstein (collectively “Salzsteins”) have just filed suit against a number of common carriers engaged in the shipment of goods by motor vehicle — five named defendants 1 and an unnamed John Doe, as to which Complaint ¶ 8 says this:

At all relevant times, John Doe, was a corporation and/or partnership doing business as a common carrier in the State of Illinois.

Based on its initial examination of the Complaint, 2 this Court issues this sua sponte opinion to require the curing of some of Salzsteins’ mistaken jurisdictional…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Knife Works v. National Metal CraftersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Central National Bank in ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tammy Howell, a Minor, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Charles Goerdt v. Tribune Entertainment Company and Abc Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Griffith v. Keystone Steel and WireDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Hai Yang Liu v. 88 Harborview Realty, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API