John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Central National Bank in Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
This mortgage foreclosure action has been filed here on claimed diversity of citizenship grounds under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). But responsive to the requirements of Illinois law for a binding foreclosure decree, 1 plaintiff has named “unknown owners and non-record claimants” as parties defendant, contemplating notice to them by publication in accordance with statute. 2 That joinder of “unknown owners and non-record claimants” poses subject matter jurisdictional problems this Court must raise and deal with sua sponte.
Defendants whose precise…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Ellen Molnar v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Ward v. ConnorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
3Cited by17 opinions
- Salzstein v. Bekins Van Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Controlled Environment Systems v. Sun Process Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Bancboston Mortgage Corp. v. PieroniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- John Hancock Realty Development Corp. v. HarteDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.