Legal Opinion

Coleman v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1966No. 3808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

By information appellant was charged with unlawful possession of a pistol after conviction of a felony in violation of Code 1961, § 22-3203. 1

A pretrial motion to suppress the pistol was granted, but nevertheless appellant was convicted of the offense after a nonjury trial. This appeal ensued.

At the trial Detective Robert E. Smythe of the Metropolitan Police Department testified that at approximately 3:00 A.M. on March 27, 1965, he was called to Casualty Hospital to investigate a shooting. There he attempted to interview the victim, one Smith, but was unable to do so…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Marion C. Bowman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MillettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Morrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Morrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API