Legal Opinion
Abbey v. Rowland
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 17, 2005No. 3:03CV172 (DJS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
SQUATRITO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are all former state employees whose jobs were eliminated during budget cuts that took effect in February 2003. Defendants were, at the time of the budget cuts, the governor of the State of Connect icut and the commissioner of a state agency, respectively. The defendants have moved to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and also for failure to state a claim. The motion to dismiss [doc. # 54] is GRANTED.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The facts and inferences herein are drawn generally from plaintiffs’ pleadings, which are…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shondel Church v. State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Church v. MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- Bogle v. Department of Mental Health and Addiction ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Dippel v. Members of CongressDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.