Legal Opinion
Dippel v. Members of Congress
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 31, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01619Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JOHN VAN HOUTEN DIPPEL, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:23-cv-1619 (VAB) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, Defendants. ORDER On December 23, 2024, the Court issued an order dismissing this case due to Mr. Dippel’s failure to respond to the Court’s order to show cause. See Order Dismissing Case, ECF No. 14; Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 7 (May 12, 2024). Mr. Dippel moved to reopen the case due to an alleged error by the Clerk’s Office to file his response to the order to show cause that he allegedly mailed “on or about May 30, 2024[.]” See Motion to Reopen Case, ECF…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bogan v. Scott-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Kim v. KimmCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Edward Tocker v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., Also Known as Altria Group, Inc., Kraft Foods Inc., and General Foods Corp., No. 04-5904-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.