Legal Opinion

People v. Ferrell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1980No. A046054PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STRANKMAN, J.

This case arises out of a callous attack by appellant Clistie Mae Ferrell on Tabatha Perreira, which left Perreira permanently paralyzed. Appellant came to Ferreira’s home, shot Ferreira’s father in the knee, and shot Perreira in the neck. Perreira had never previously seen appellant. The principal question in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support appellant’s conviction of aggravated mayhem as defined in Penal Code section 205, which prohibits intentionally causing permanent disability or disfigurement of another.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. ManibusanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. AhmedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. SZADZIEWICZCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. QuinteroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. SekonaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API