Legal Opinion

People v. Santana

California Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 2013No. S198324PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Penal Code 1 section 203, which defines the offense of simple mayhem, provides that “[e]very person who unlawfully and maliciously deprives a human being of a member of his body, or disables, disfigures, or renders it useless, or cuts or disables the tongue, or puts out an eye, or slits the nose, ear, or lip, is guilty of mayhem.” Though the provision makes no mention of “serious bodily injury,” the pattern jury instruction on mayhem (CALCRIM No. 801) requires the prosecution to prove that the defendant caused the victim “serious bodily injury.” The issue here is whether…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. MinceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. KippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. ManibusanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. Mullins, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API