Legal Opinion
Unisys Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 18, 2009No. 09-800CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This unusual case involves Congress’s recent decision to limit the jurisdiction of a parallel system for protesting certain government procurements, and expand the existing process at the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”). The protestor asserts that the procurement at issue is within the jurisdiction of GAO and that the procuring agency, the Transportation Security Administration (“TSA”) must either stay performance of the contract until the conclusion of the protest in accord with 31 U.S.C. § 3553 or follow the statutory procedure for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ramcor Services Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Supreme Foodservice Gmbh v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Sra International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- PMTech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Harris Patriot Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Mission Essential Personnel, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.