Legal Opinion

Smith v. Carter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — C. J. St. John, Special Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The hill in the present case was filed by certain taxpayers, of Washington county to test the constitution*3ality of chapter 43 of the First Extra Session of the Acts of the legislature of 1913.

The first section of the act reads:

“That road improvement districts may be organized in the State of Tennessee for the purpose of constructing new roads, bridges, and culverts, and maintaining public roads already established, and to have full control of all public roads within the territory, embraced within such road improvement districts; and such road improvement districts organized under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Bigham v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Maxey v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quinn v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Carriger v. Mayor of MorristownTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Beery v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Williamson v. McClainTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  5. In re Forked Deer Drainage DistrictTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API