Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Apportionment

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1951No. 4-9607Published

1Opinion of the Court

243 S.W.2d 755 (1951)

SMITH et al.

v.

BOARD OF APPORTIONMENT.

No. 4-9607.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 3, 1951.

Goodwin & Riff el, Little Rock, for petitioners.

Ike Murry, Atty. Gen., Cleveland Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

Bailey & Warren, Little Rock, for interveners.

GRIFFIN SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding under Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution. See Bailey, Lieutenant Governor, v. Abington, 291 Ark. 1072, 148 S.W.2d 176, 149 S. W.2d 573; Shaw, Autry and Shofner v. Adkins, Governor, 202 Ark. 856, 153 S.W.2d 415; Butler v. Democratic State Committee, 204…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey, Lieutenant-Governor v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Shaw, Autry and Shofner v. Adkins, Gov.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Smith v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  4. Butler v. Democratic State CommitteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  5. Carpenter v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API