Legal Opinion

Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 26, 1981No. Court 75-10-02534PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge:

In this action, plaintiff sues to recover duties assessed on the cost of repairs made in a foreign country to its barge, the Cambria. The repairs, on which duties were assessed and which plaintiff seeks to have refunded, were made in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, in 1973.

Plaintiff, Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc., operates a dry bulk cargo facility. In its operation, plaintiff loads and unloads deep-water vessels, stores dry bulk materials and handles scrap metal for export.

The Cambria was purchased by the plaintiff on July 9, 1973 for use as a crane platform moored at its place…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. South Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API