Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff, Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. (Kurz), seeks to recover duties paid to the United States pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1466(a) (1982) for ship repairs performed in a foreign country on the S.S. Spirit of Liberty, a United States flag vessel.
Kurz contends that Section 214(c)(3)(B) of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, which amended 19 U.S.C. § 1466(e) (1984 Amendment), entitles it to remission of the duties that it paid for the ship repairs. The amendment provides for the retroactive remission of duties “[u]pon request therefor ...” filed within 90 days of the amendment’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
- Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994