Legal Opinion

Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided October 13, 1988No. Court 86-04-00428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff, Chas. Kurz & Co., Inc. (Kurz), seeks to recover duties paid to the United States pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1466(a) (1982) for ship repairs performed in a foreign country on the S.S. Spirit of Liberty, a United States flag vessel.

Kurz contends that Section 214(c)(3)(B) of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1984, which amended 19 U.S.C. § 1466(e) (1984 Amendment), entitles it to remission of the duties that it paid for the ship repairs. The amendment provides for the retroactive remission of duties “[u]pon request therefor ...” filed within 90 days of the amendment’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  4. Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API