Legal Opinion

Eau Claire Electric Co-Operative v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The only issue in the proceeding before the commission was whether compensation admittedly due is to be increased by 15 per cent under the provisions of sec. 102.57, Stats. That section provides in part:

“Where injury is caused by the failure of the employer to comply with any statute or any lawful order of the commission, compensation and death benefits as provided in this chapter shall be increased 15 per cent.”

The record discloses that the foreman directed Gunnes to work in a place and under conditions which were dangerous, but which the foreman mistakenly believed safe. The foreman’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Paine Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. L. G. Arnold, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Saxe Operating Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wasley v. KosmatkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Van Sluys v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Milwaukee Forge v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API