Legal Opinion

Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Sec. 102.57, Stats., provides:

“Where injury is caused by the failure of the employer to comply with any statute or any lawful order of the commission, compensation and death benefits as provided in this chapter shall be increased 15 per cent. Failure of an employer reasonably to enforce compliance by employes with such statute or order of the commission shall constitute failure by the employer to comply with such statute or order.”

A safety order of the commission, 2 Wis. Adm. Code, sec. Ind 1.84, February, 1962, Register No. 74, provides:

“ (1) Cranes, derricks, hoists, power shovels, drag…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. L. G. Arnold, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Eau Claire Electric Co-Operative v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SalasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jaramillo v. Anaconda Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Casey v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Jaramillo v. Anaconda Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API