Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Arizona, State of

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 8, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00237Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jason Pearson, No. CV-20-00237-PHX-MTL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 State of Arizona, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff Jason Pearson’s Motion to Remand (the “Motion”) 16 (Doc. 69). The Court now resolves this Motion as follows. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 The following factual summary derives from the Amended Complaint. Mr. 19 Pearson began working as a correctional officer at CoreCivic, Inc.’s and CoreCivic of 20 Tennessee, LLC’s (collectively, “CoreCivic”) Red Rock Correctional Center in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API