Legal Opinion

Halvorson v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1976No. 44705PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, Justice.

Defendant American Hoist and Derrick Company appeals from an order of the district court denying its post-trial motion following a jury verdict finding American Hoist 25-percent causally negligent and plaintiff’s employer, Barton Contracting Company, 75-percent causally negligent. The district court denied American Hoist’s third-party claims of indemnity and contribution against Barton. We hold that American Hoist was not negligent as a matter of law, and we therefore do not reach other issues it raised.

On June 7, 1968, plaintiff, Kenneth Halvorson, was employed by Barton on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Holm v. Sponco Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Skyhook Corp. v. JasperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Vera Randall v. Warnaco, Inc., Hirsch-Weis DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API