Legal Opinion
Gerst v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 19, 1996No. 95-499PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
Appellants, Jeff C. Gerst and Kari R. Gerst, sued appellees, Billy G. Marshall, Jr., Cindy R. Marshall and Reif Oil Co., after the Gersts discovered petroleum contamination on land they had purchased from the Mar-shalls. The district court granted summary judgment to the Marshalls and Reif Oil, concluding the Gersts had faded to generate factual questions on several issues. Because we agree the Gersts have not produced sufficient evidence to allow a fact finder to conclude conduct of the Marshalls or Reif Oil caused the contamination on the Gersts’ property, we affirm the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Hyler v. GarnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Thompson v. KaczinskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Thermogas Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- EFCO Corp. v. Symons Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Asher v. Ob-Gyn Specialists, P.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2014
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.