Legal Opinion
Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 29, 2009No. 09-5187PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
Eugene Davis, an Army veteran, claims that he was eligible for early retirement and extra pay in accordance with the Temporary Early Retirement Authority. See 10 U.S.C. § 1186 and § 1293. He appeals the District Court’s dismissal of his claim as time-barred under the applicable six-year statute of limitations. Davis v. United States, No. 06-02087, slip op. at 9 (W.D.Tenn. Jan. 30, 2009). He contends that the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (“Board”) erroneously refused to correct his military record, a condition necessary for a valid application…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Calvin Geyen, Jr. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the United States ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Sherwood v. PrelesnikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Michael C. Seepe, Private, United States Marine Corps v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- James B. Smith v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Nihiser v. WhiteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Roman-Cancel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Conner v. U.S. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Lanier-Finn v. Department of the ArmyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Alexander v. Department of the Army - Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.