Legal Opinion
Nihiser v. White
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2002No. Civ.A. 01-1817(RCL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Secretary of the Army’s motion to dismiss. The Secretary argues that the complaint should be dismissed because it was filed after the statute of limitations had expired, because the plaintiff lacks standing, and because the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After a careful review of the opposition and reply, the applicable law, and the record in this case, the Court finds that the Secretary’s motion to dismiss should be GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
In 1990 Congress found it…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Johnnie E. GREEN, Appellant, v. Hon. Thomas E. WHITE, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Maxberry v. Department of the Army, Board of Correction of Military RecordsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Youming Jin v. Ministry of State SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Sabree v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Dean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.