United States v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HULL, Circuit Judge:
This sentencing appeal presents questions regarding the interplay of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a), and motions for reconsideration. Specifically, does Rule 35(a)’s seven-day time limit for correcting errors in sentences apply to a reduced sentence stemming from a § 3582(c)(2) proceeding? We first recount the events leading to this appeal.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Phillips’s 1989 Original Sentence
Following a jury trial in 1989, Ronald Reginald Phillips was convicted of six drug-related offenses involving more than 50 grams of crack cocaine and a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- United States v. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Pedro Rafael Caraballo-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jerry Jerome AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Charles LLewlynCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jazzman Rickeem BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.