Moore v. Honican

{¶ 30} While I agree with much of the analysis outlined by the majority, I conclude that Moore presented insufficient evidence to overcome summary judgment on the issue of whether Honican had acted wantonly.

{¶ 31} Last year, this court addressed the level of misconduct required to constitute wantonness.14 In that case, we wrote that “[wjanton or reckless misconduct is more than negligence. Wanton misconduct is the failure to exercise any care whatsoever. ‘[M]ere negligence is not converted into wanton misconduct unless the evidence establishes a disposition to perversity on the part of the…