Legal Opinion

Deering v. Alexander

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1978No. 420-896, SC 25204PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, J., Pro Tempore

This is a breach of contract action arising out of an agreement to transfer a refuse collection business. The case was tried before the court without a jury. After hearing all the testimony, the trial judge determined that an oral agreement between plaintiff and defendant which plaintiff sought to have enforced was superseded by and integrated into a subsequent written agreement, and that the terms of the written agreement were controlling. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

On January 1, 1970, plaintiff Deering (as Seller) and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. CALDWELL ET UX v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. DeVore v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Barnstable v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Elston v. WAGNEROregon Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Howell v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Edwards v. Times Mirror Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. Greenwade v. Citizens Bank of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API