Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Forfeiture of One Front-End Loader

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1992No. Docket 122531PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJansen, J.

On November 5, 1986, the Oakland County Prosecuting Attorney filed a petition for forfeiture pursuant to the statute proscribing the dismantling of stolen motor vehicles, MCL 750.535a; MSA 28.803(1), seeking forfeiture of certain property seized from Country Collision on March 11, 1986. On October 26, 1988, the trial court heard arguments on the interpretation of paragraphs a and c of subsection 5 of MCL 750.535a; MSA 28.803(1). As worded at the time of the seizure, MCL 750.535a(5); MSA 28.803(1)(5) allowed the seizure and forfeiture of:(a) Any engine, tool, machine, implement, device,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. People v. HawkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. NinehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. DorringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Jordan v. JarvisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Attorney General v. Lake States Wood Preserving, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People of Michigan v. Anthony Gayl LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API