Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 12, 2007No. A06-1796PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge. *

Appellant, a social host who provided alcohol to a minor, moved to dismiss an action brought against him under Minn. Stat. § 340A.90 (2004) on the ground that Minn.Stat. § 573.02 (2004), prescribing a three-year limitation for wrongful death actions, precludes the action. The district court denied his motion on the ground that the six-year limitation prescribed by Minn. Stat. § 541.05 (2004) governs actions brought under Minn.Stat. § 340A.90. Under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 103.03(1), appellant then moved the district court to certify as important and doubtful the question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LariveeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Wollan v. JahnzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe Affiliates 1-20, and Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, and Third Party v. Berwald Roofing Company, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Doran v. Independent School District No. 720Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Blumhardt v. Independent School District No. 361Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. City of Baxter v. City of BrainerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Jeremy McNitt, Relator v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT)Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API