Legal Opinion

Abel v. Bonfanti

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1985No. 84 Civ. 9161 (RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

The defendants in this action, Albert L. Bonfanti III (“Bonfanti”), Fast Food Operators, Inc., d/b/a Popeyes Famous Fried Chicken and Biscuits (“FFO”), Hyman Schifrin (“Schifrin”), Alan Altman (“Altman”), Stanley Ratner (“Ratner”) and Steven Roman (“Roman”) have moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. For the following reasons defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

Pleadings and Facts

Plaintiff Albert P. Abel (“Abel”) filed this action in December, 1984 after being fired from his position as vice…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. MurdockSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Arthur Manoharan, M.D. v. Columbia University College of Physicians & SurgeonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Davis v. State University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Long v. AT & T Information Systems Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Carris v. First Student, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
  5. Roman v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API