Legal Opinion
Hideo Matsuda v. Michiko Wada
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 3, 2000No. CIV. 98-756 ACKPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
KAY, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Hideo Matsuda (“Plaintiff’) is the owner of the racing yacht Big Apple III (“the yacht”). Both Plaintiff and Michiko Wada (“Defendant”) are citizens of Japan. Defendant is also a permanent resident alien residing in Hawaii. All parties agree that Plaintiff hired Defendant to help him in some capacity with his campaign to win the 1998 Kenwood Cup; the dispute is over how much compensation Defendant was promised for her services and what damages Plaintiff is owed from Defendant’s tortious attempts to collect by willfully…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Richard McCarthy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mullane v. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Viernes v. Executive Mortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
- Thompson v. Deloitte & Touche LLPDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- Chavez-Organista v. VanosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Van Der Steen v. Sygen International, PLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.