Legal Opinion

K.R. v. B.M.H.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1999No. 89,594PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

¶ 1 The issues before this Court are whether the trial court abused its discretion in restricting the paternal grandparent’s visitation and having it coincide with the father’s visitation. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of grand-parental visitation.

I. FACTS

¶ 2 G.M. was born on February 9, 1991, to K.R. and B.M.H., the appellees. The ap-pellees were unmarried college students at the time of G.M.’s birth. Three months after G.M.’s birth, K.R. (father) brought this action to establish his paternity. B.M.H. (mother) was given primary custody with the father…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mueggenborg v. WallingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. In Re BomgardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Herbst v. SayreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Kahre v. KahreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Application of GroverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Daniel v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. In Re Baby Girl L.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. S.W. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Marriage of Craig v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF S.A.H.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API