Hi-Fort, Inc. v. Burnette
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
Petitioner’s Appeal
Petitioner offered evidence intended to prove, by a superior chain of title, its alleged 169/264 undivided interest as tenant in common in the Burnette property. Petitioner’s first assignment of error is directed to the trial court’s exclusion of Petitioner’s Exhibits Nos. 4 and 5. Exhibit No. 4, the ultimate link in the chain of title to petitioner, is the deed from Jay Burnette et ux, Ruth Burnette to Hi-Fort, Inc., recorded in Book 90, at page 373, Swain County Registry. Exhibit No. 5 is an option given by Jay Burnette and wife to Hi-Fort, Inc., to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Covington v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
- McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- NEW HOME BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY v. NationsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harvey v. ChristopherSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- Sheets v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Herbert v. BabsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Ellis v. PoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985