Legal Opinion

Hi-Fort, Inc. v. Burnette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 31, 1979No. 7830SC716PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Petitioner’s Appeal

Petitioner offered evidence intended to prove, by a superior chain of title, its alleged 169/264 undivided interest as tenant in common in the Burnette property. Petitioner’s first assignment of error is directed to the trial court’s exclusion of Petitioner’s Exhibits Nos. 4 and 5. Exhibit No. 4, the ultimate link in the chain of title to petitioner, is the deed from Jay Burnette et ux, Ruth Burnette to Hi-Fort, Inc., recorded in Book 90, at page 373, Swain County Registry. Exhibit No. 5 is an option given by Jay Burnette and wife to Hi-Fort, Inc., to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Covington v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. McClure v. . CrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. NEW HOME BUILDING SUPPLY COMPANY v. NationsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harvey v. ChristopherSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  2. Sheets v. SheetsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Herbert v. BabsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Ellis v. PoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API