Sheets v. Sheets
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
Our courts have, on numerous occasions, applied the law of constructive ouster. See Dobbins v. Dobbins, 141 N.C. 210, 53 S.E. 870 (1906); Thomas v. Garvin, 15 N.C. 223 (1833); Collier v. Welker, 19 N.C. App. 617, 199 S.E. 2d 691 (1973). The rule has been criticized as penalizing a cotenant out of possession for “sleeping on his rights,” when under the traditional rules of adverse possession, cotenants share a special fiduciary relationship virtually precluding adverse possession by any other means. 1
On the facts before us, however, we need not consider the potential…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dobbins v. Dobbins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Collier v. WelkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Thomas v. . GarvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
- Hi-Fort, Inc. v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Mott v. Carolina Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Casstevens v. CasstevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Herbert v. BabsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Ellis v. PoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Atl. Coast Props., Inc. v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015