Legal Opinion

King v. Paylor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1942No. 6125PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS, PJ.

This cause comes before the court upon the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time allowed by the statute.

The judgment was entered on the journal on January 23rd, 1942. The notice of appeal bears the stamp of the clerk showing that it was filed on February 13th, 1942. By excluding the first day and including the last, as required by §10216 GC, it is disclosed that this notice was filed on the 21st day alter the judgment.

It appears by affidavit that counsel for the appellant went to the court house on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ferguson v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. In Re Guardianship of CarnigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Martin v. SodenIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. Reese RefrigerationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Louden v. A.O. Smith Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Yancey v. PylesOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API