Legal Opinion

Louden v. A.O. Smith Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2009No. Nos. 2007-1819 and 2007-1821PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} The issue before us is whether a trial court’s case-management order that requires parties in asbestos cases to file trial court documents electronically also authorized those same parties to file a notice of appeal electronically. We hold that filing an appeal requires an appellant to present a paper copy of the notice of appeal to the clerk of the trial court, unless a rule of appellate procedure expressly permits the notice of appeal to be filed electronically. In the instant case, the court of appeals has not adopted any rule permitting such electronic filing. Because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Compuserve, Incorporated v. Richard S. Patterson, Individually, and Flashpoint DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. State v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. King v. PaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Welsh Development Co. v. Warren County Regional Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. KY Invest. Properties, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Rutushin v. ArditiOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State Ex Rel. Orange Township Board of Trustees v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State Ex Rel. Orange Township Board of Trustees v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API