Legal Opinion

Stackhouse v. Russell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1989No. 88-1381PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Justice.

A dissolution of marriage decree, incorporating a stipulation, directed the husband to provide life insurance (death benefits under a collective bargaining agreement) in favor of the two daughters of the parties. Upon his later remarriage the husband nevertheless made the benefits payable to his second wife. The question here is whether Iowa courts are precluded from enforcing the decree by reason of the employee retirement income security act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq. We agree with the trial court’s determination that our courts can and should enforce the decree.

Geor…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ridgway v. RidgwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. In Re Marriage of HuntAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Cartledge v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Rose Marie Wheaton, and Douglas Wheaton and Daniel WheatonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Knowles v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. Bentley v. New York Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Reyher v. Trust Annuity Plan for Pilots of Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
  5. Bentley v. New York Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API