Bentley v. New York Life Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Beneficiary of a life insurance policy appeals a trial court determination denying *78her claim to all insurance proceeds. We reverse in part.
FACTS
Michele Foster (Foster) and Patrick Murphy (Murphy) were married on February 10, 1973. In 1976, Murphy purchased a term life insurance policy, #35-248-152 (Policy 1), on his own life from New York Life Insurance Company (New York). Policy 1 was a decreasing term policy with a death benefit that decreased over the 20-year term of the policy. The policy was originally in the amount of $25,000. The primary beneficiary on this policy was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Garrett v. BankWest, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Groseth International, Inc. v. Tenneco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Pickering v. PickeringSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Breen v. Dakota Gear & Joint Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Trammell v. Prairie States Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fox v. BurdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Bentley v. New York Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Foster v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Fox v. BurdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Huerta Rodriguez v. BrandenburgerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023