Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. Seeman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 9, 2009No. 08 Civ. 5899PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Jeffery Bernstein (“Bernstein”) brought this action against defendants May Seeman (“Seeman”), MEAG NY Corporation (“MEAG NY”), Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. (“Munich Re”), and Munich Reinsurance Germany (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his religion, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). Bernstein also alleges that Defendants retaliated against him after he initially filed his discrimination claim, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Nicole Schiano v. Quality Payroll Systems, Inc. And Michael Tintweiss, Docket No. 05-4115 CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- D'Annunzio v. Ayken, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Officemax Inc. v. CinottiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Roginsky v. County of Suffolk, NYDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Kingsdown, Inc. v. HinshawNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015
- Lively v. Wafra Inv. Advisory Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.