Legal Opinion

IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 29, 2021No. 4:19-cv-02033Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' 7 RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL 10 APPLE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 141 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This discovery dispute involves a subpoena duces tecum (“Subpoena”) seeking documents 15 from non-party Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron Co.” or “Pegatron”), a technology manufacturer 16 with its headquarters in Taiwan. Pegatron has refused to comply with the Subpoena on the ground 17 that it was not served…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Stormans Inc v. Mary SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API