IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' 7 RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 v. MOTION TO COMPEL 10 APPLE INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 141 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This discovery dispute involves a subpoena duces tecum (“Subpoena”) seeking documents 15 from non-party Pegatron Corporation (“Pegatron Co.” or “Pegatron”), a technology manufacturer 16 with its headquarters in Taiwan. Pegatron has refused to comply with the Subpoena on the ground 17 that it was not served…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Stormans Inc v. Mary SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.