Legal Opinion
Mashaney v. Board of Indigents' Defense Services
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided November 8, 2013No. 108,353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAnany, J.:
Jason Mashaney s convictions for sex crimes were set aside and a new trial was ordered. Before the retrial Mashaney pled guilty to amended charges. He tiren sued his criminal defense lawyers for malpractice, but the district court dismissed his claims. Mashaneys appeal raises the following issues; (1) whether the Board of Indigents’ Defense Services (BIDS) maybe sued for legal malpractice; (2) whether Mashaneys civil malpractice claims against the individual attorneys are barred by our 2-year statute of limitations; (3) whether such malpractice claims are dependent upon Mashaney…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Peeler v. Hughes & LuceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mashaney v. Board of Indigents' Defense ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Garcia v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Rodina v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
- Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
- Mark O'Hara Wright v. Andrew C. Graves, Esq.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.